Victory for family in long-standing battle with HMRC in family business case
19 December 2023
In the long-anticipated judgment of HMRC v Fisher [2023] UKSC 44 (21 November 2023), the Supreme Court held that the transfer of a business to Gibraltar was not caught by the Transfer of Assets Abroad rules as the transfer was not made by the individual shareholders but rather by their UK company.
The Fisher family were shareholders in a UK betting company. As the company branched into tele-betting, they decided to carry on this part of the trade from Gibraltar, for reasons of tax efficiency. The tele-betting business was therefore transferred from the UK company to a Gibraltar company.
HMRC sought to tax the Fishers on the income of the Gibraltar company under the Transfer of Assets Abroad rules, on the basis that they had the power to enjoy the income of the Gibraltar company.
In the First-tier Tribunal, it was held that the Fishers were “transferors” and therefore caught by the Transfer of Assets Abroad rules (though one family member, Anne, successfully appealed on a point of EU law).
The Upper Tribunal disagreed and held that the rules did not apply as the family members did not affect the transfer personally.
In the Court of Appeal, it was held that since the family were involved in the decision-making of the business, they were “quasi-transferors”, so the rules applied.
Finally, the case went to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court held that, for the rules to apply, the transfer of assets has to be made by the individual transferors who then have the power to enjoy the income of the person abroad.
It was also held that an individual’s family members cannot be treated as transferors by virtue of being shareholders in the company which made the transfer. This would still be the case for majority shareholders and directors of the company.
After ten long years through the courts, the Fishers’ appeals were allowed.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court was highly critical of HMRC’s general approach to the Transfer of Assets Abroad rules, and in particular their argument that taxpayers’ uncertainty about whether the rules applied to them should be regarded as something positive. This case provides some welcome clarification on these difficult tax rules.
The Birketts view
As the judgment notes, the Transfer of Assets Abroad rules are some of the most fiendishly complex and least understood UK tax rules. It is hardly surprising that the court has reached a different judgment at each stage. It remains to be seen whether the Government will implement legislation to counter the result of this case in Finance Bill 2024.
-
Katherine Forster
-
Alex Hunt
-
Deborah Carrivick
-
Jane Johnson
Services
The content of this article is for general information only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. If you require any further information in relation to this article please contact the author in the first instance. Law covered as at December 2023.